Sagebrush rebellion flares up in New Mexico
SUMMIT COUNTY — A New Mexico congressman is inciting residents of his district and state to violate federal laws by ignoring Forest Service regulations on motorized travel and encouraging local communities to cut trees on federal land without required permits and environmental studies.
Additionally, Sierra County Sheriff Joe Baca, Jr., publicly (on a Facebook page) threatened to arrest federal employees if they try to close national forest roads pursuant to Forest Service regulations (see the Facebook thread at the end of the story).
U.S. Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.) is leading yet another version of a sagebrush rebellion against the federal government, resulting what is being described by environmental groups as vigilante destruction of public lands.
The Center for Biological Diversity says Catron County bulldozed 13 miles of the San Francisco River in Catron County, and violated private property rights in the process. The southeastern New Mexico county has long been a hotbed of anti-federal sentiment. The river is designated critical habitat for the endangered loach minnow; the bulldozed section includes an inventoried roadless area downstream of Reserve.
In a press release dated Aug. 3, 2011, seven days before the bulldozing incident, Pearce highlighted the fact that sheriffs in counties that patrol the Gila will not enforce roadless rules or the Forest Service’s travel management plan, which manages off-road vehicle use.
“If the Forest Service goes forward with their Travel Management Plan, then my deputies will not be out there keeping people off the roads,” said Sierra County Sheriff Joe Baca. “I will send back the $16,000 I’m given for forest patrols. I have better things to do — preventing real crimes — than keeping people out of the forest.”
The only federal response from the Obama administration has been a multi-agency tour of the area and a letter from the Forest Service to the county.
“Public and elected officials should not be encouraging or engaging in vigilantism on private and federal public lands,” said Cyndi Tuell at the Center for Biological Diversity. “This radical anti-environmental agenda is as dangerous and misinformed as it is out of touch with Americans’ public-lands values.”
At an August town hall in Eager, Ariz., Congressman Pearce urged counties to take control of all the land within their boundaries, including federal public land.
On Sept. 17 Pearce and Otero County officials plan to log an acre of national forest land without federal permits as a protest against Forest Service environmental regulations.
The Otero County Commission voted in June to create an emergency forest plan, allowing the county to forego U.S. Forest Service policy and cut trees in the event of an emergency. They created an 80,000-acre plan that calls for responsible management to protect local watershed and prevent fires that have threatened Cloudcroft for many years.
Otero County Commissioner Ronny Rardin has spearheaded efforts to thin the forest around Cloudcroft.
“This is not just about a tree,” said Rardin. “It’s about the fact that our county has been in a declared state of emergency for quite some time now because of severe drought. Our forest has been overcrowded for too long. We are going to show the world what an acre of forest land should look like.”
Click here for more information on Rep. Pearce’s recent activities.
Here’s a statement from Jamie Dickerman, press secretary for Rep. Pearce:
“There are many statements in your piece on Congressman Pearce that are misleading and incorrect. Congressman Pearce is not going to be engaged in any act against the law, nor is he encouraging people to break the law. According to the County Commission’s Emergency Plan, in times of emergency cutting should be handled by the county. In June Otero County voted on the emergency plan that calls for responsible management to protect local watershed and prevent fires. Under New Mexico state statute, Senate Bill 1 NM–4-36-11, it is indicated that the county commission has the right to cut trees within a state of emergency. To do so, they can contract to private contractors to go in and manage the forest or the county commissioners have the authority to perform the cutting themselves. Not just anyone can cut trees. The county is given specific authority to do so by the statute. Only those who are authorized by the county or deputized by the Sheriff will be able to cut trees, making this a lawful act.”
A Facebook Page maintained by local-control advocates in the region tells a different story. Here are some of the posts, illustrating how Pearce’s comments are perceived:
Joe E. Baca Jr.Sorry I could not make it last night. Just know that I will not let them close any roads and if they so choose to do so I will arrest them for unlawfully closing a county road. They have no jurisdiction in Sierra County without me and I will not give them any. You have my support 100% and we will keeps the forest open!
This article originally appeared here.
|Photo © Paul S. Hamilton||HOME / DONATE NOW / SIGN UP FOR E-NETWORK / CONTACT US / PHOTO USE /|