| For Immediate Release, November 1, 2018 
                            
                              | Contacts: | Perrin  de Jong, Center for Biological Diversity, (828) 595-1862, [email protected]Ron Sutherland, Wildlands  Network, (919) 641-0060, [email protected]
 Maggie Howell, Wolf  Conservation Center, (914) 763-2373, [email protected]
 Ben Prater, Defenders of  Wildlife, (828) 412-0981,                                [email protected]
 Marjorie Fishman, Animal  Welfare Institute, (202) 446-2128, [email protected]
 |  Analysis:  Public Overwhelmingly Opposes Plan to Curtail Red Wolf Recovery in North  Carolina 99.9 Percent of Commenters  Support Red Wolf Conservation WASHINGTON— The U.S. Fish and Wildlife  Service proposal to drastically  reduce protection for the nation’s only wild population of endangered red wolves has met nearly unanimous opposition from more than 100,000 members of the  public.  Out of 108,124 comments submitted to the  Fish and Wildlife Service on the proposal, 107,988 comments — or 99.9 percent —  spoke out in favor of the red wolves and their need for strong federal  protections. In June, the  Service solicited public comments on its management plan for the red wolf,  which survives only in eastern North Carolina with as few as 30 individuals.  The Service proposed  reducing the recovery area where the wolves can safely roam by more than 90  percent. The revised recovery area would only be expected to provide sufficient  space for 10 to 15 red wolves.  The proposal  would eliminate protections for any red wolves that wander off Alligator River  National Wildlife Refuge and Dare County Bombing Range. The plan would allow  anyone to kill red wolves on private lands for any reason. “People overwhelmingly oppose the Trump  administration’s dangerous plan to slash the red wolf recovery area,” said  Perrin de Jong, a Center for Biological Diversity staff attorney based in North  Carolina. “This reckless proposal would put these unique animals in immediate  jeopardy of being lost from the wild forever. Citizens from the recovery area,  across the state and around the country clearly want the feds to do more, not  less, to protect the world’s most endangered wolf.” "Many of  us have long wondered why Americans of previous generations didn't rise up to  save the ivory-billed woodpecker, the passenger pigeon or the Carolina  parakeet,” said Dr. Ron Sutherland, conservation scientist for the Wildlands  Network. “Well, here we are in 2018, and the American people have spoken with a  strong and virtually unanimous voice that the red wolf must be saved from  extinction and kept in the wild where the species belongs. Will Congress and  the Service listen?"  "Once  again, the American public has expressed overwhelming support for the red wolf.  The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must heed this call, recommit to proven  management strategies and work to prevent the extinction of the world's most  endangered canine," said Ben Prater, Southeast program director, Defenders  of Wildlife. “Every voice  raised in support of wildlife can make a difference, and Americans  overwhelmingly support the Red Wolf Recovery Program,” said Maggie Howell, executive  director of the Wolf Conservation Center. “We’re counting on the Service to  take notice and follow the best available science to ensure that the world’s  most endangered wolves remain a living, breathing part of the landscape in  eastern North Carolina.” People living  in the areas most directly affected by red wolves also expressed strong support  for their conservation. Out of 2,923 comments submitted by North Carolinians,  2,898 comments, or 99.1 percent, spoke out in favor of red wolves. From the current  five-county recovery area in eastern North Carolina where the wolves live, 75  out of 95 comments submitted were also pro-wolf.   North  Carolina’s governor also spoke out against the Service’s proposal and expressed  support for red wolf recovery. “There is a viable path forward for North  Carolina’s red wolves living in the wild, and I have directed relevant  departments in my administration to work with USFWS to continue the recovery  program and build upon its success to date,” said Gov. Roy Cooper in a comment submitted  to the Service on July 30.  Only 19  comments specifically supported the agency’s plan to eliminate red wolf protections  and shrink the recovery area. Of 30 additional comments opposing red wolf  recovery, 13 came from a single real estate developer.   Volunteers from  the Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Wildlands Network  and the Wolf Conservation Center reviewed each of the thousands of comments submitted  to produce this analysis.  In the past, the  Service released inaccurate tallies of wolf public comments it had received. In  2017, during the initial scoping period for the current proposal, the agency reported only  12,000 out of 55,000 red wolf comments, ignoring extensive compilations of  comments submitted by conservation organizations. “Wildlife,  including red wolves, are managed by the USFWS in trust for the American  people,” noted D.J. Schubert, wildlife biologist at the Animal Welfare  Institute. “The people have now spoken loud and clear of their support for the  protection and recovery of the red wolf in the wild and it is time the  government starts to listen and comply with the public’s clear message. Less  than 20 years ago, there were more than 130 red wolves in the wild. These  numbers can be achieved again if the USFWS complies with federal law.”   Additional Media ResourcesExcel  spreadsheets documenting all of the comments included in the tallies reported  above can be found in this Dropbox Folder,  which also contains a select group of individual comments from various  scientific, legal and political authorities.
 Wildlands  Network has placed photos of wild and captive wolves in this Dropbox Folder. Wildlands  Network's videos of wild red wolves are available here.
 
 The Wolf Conservation Center also has an extensive library of photos and videos  of captive red wolves - contact Maggie Howell, (914) 763-2373,  [email protected]
 |