| 
 For Immediate Release,  March 4, 2013 Contact: 
              Brendan Cummings, (760) 366-2232 x 304 or [email protected] Bill Aims to Protect Bobcats From Commercial Fur  Trapping in California             Legislation Responds  to Sharp Increase in Trapping for International Fur Trade  SACRAMENTO, Calif.— California Assembly  Member Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica) has introduced the  Bobcat Protection Act of 2013, which would prohibit the commercial trapping of  bobcats in California.  The bill, A.B. 1213, responds to an increase in the commercial trapping of  bobcats in California driven by a rise in  demand from China  for bobcat pelts. Numerous bobcats were killed this past year just outside the  boundary of Joshua Tree National Park by commercial trappers, potentially  depleting the park’s wildlife population.  
              
                | 
                  
                    |  |  
                    | Photo by Annica Kreuter. Photos are available for media use. |  |  “Under California’s  antiquated trapping laws, it’s perfectly legal for trappers to line the  boundary of a national park with traps, kill the park’s wildlife, and ship the animals’  pelts to China,”  said Brendan Cummings, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s  Wildlands Program. “Assemblyman Bloom’s bill is an important step in bringing California’s wildlife  law into the 21st century.  The Center  and our members throughout California  thank Assemblyman Bloom for introducing this bill that will protect one of the  state’s most ecologically-important wildlife species as well as the integrity  of our national parks.”  Rising international demand for bobcat pelts has  recently led to rising pelt prices and an increase in bobcat trapping in California. In the  2011-2012 trapping season, the number of trappers reporting bobcat trapping  more than doubled over the previous season, while the number of trapped bobcats  rose by more than 50 percent.  The Bobcat Protection Act of 2013 would ban the  commercial trapping of bobcats in California,  along with the commercial sale and export of bobcat pelts. The California Department  of Fish and Wildlife’s current authority to issue depredation permits for  bobcats would not be affected. Hunting of bobcats consistent with existing law  and regulations would still be allowed in California.  During the 2012-2013 trapping season, bobcat trapping  generated significant public controversy after traps were found by property  owners on private lands along the boundaries of Joshua Tree National Park.  Numerous bobcats that had long been observed, photographed and appreciated by residents  and tourists within and along the boundaries of the park abruptly disappeared  during the trapping season. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife still  manages bobcat trapping based on a decades-old population estimate that was  struck down as unreliable by a federal court 30 years ago. No recent population estimate exists for the state’s  bobcats. Under current regulations, an individual trapper in California can lawfully trap an unlimited  number of bobcats virtually anywhere in the state. “It would cost California far more money to come up  with a credible population estimate of bobcats, and then implement a  scientifically valid management scheme, than the pittance the state brings in  from selling trapping licenses,” said Cummings. “Bobcats are being killed for  the private profit of a few individuals engaged in the international fur trade.  But these beautiful animals are far more valuable to the state as a living  component of our wild heritage.” The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit  conservation organization with more than 500,000 members and online activists  dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.             |