For Immediate Release, December 16, 2011
||McCrystie Adams, Earthjustice, (303) 623-9466
Steve Jones, Wyoming Outdoor Council, (307) 332-7031 x 12
Taylor McKinnon, Center for Biological Diversity, (928) 310-6713
John Spahr, Sierra Club, (307) 732-0028
Gary Wockner, Save the Poudre: Poudre Waterkeeper, (970) 218-8310
John Weisheit, Living Rivers - Colorado Riverkeeper, (435) 259-1063
Zach Frankel, Utah Rivers Council, (801) 699-1856
Duane Short, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, (307) 742-7978
Warren Rider, Rocky Mountain Wild, (970) 274-3646
Jane Whalen, Citizens for Dixie’s Future, (435) 635-2133
Michael Kellett, Glen Canyon Institute, (801) 363-4450
Colorado River Protection Coalition Intervenes Against Flaming Gorge Pipeline
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Should Not Waste Resources on Unbuildable Scheme
DENVER— A coalition of 10 conservation groups from Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Arizona — the Colorado River Protection Coalition — moved to intervene Thursday in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission review of the Regional Watershed Supply Project (a.k.a. the “Flaming Gorge Pipeline”). The commission is currently evaluating a preliminary permit application for the Flaming Gorge Pipeline from Wyco Power and Water Inc.; it allows members of the public with a stake in projects to intervene in preliminary permit proceedings, and the Colorado River Protection Coalition, represented by Earthjustice, has called upon it to deny the permit on numerous grounds.
"The Flaming Gorge Pipeline would be one of the biggest, most environmentally damaging water projects in the history of the western United States," said McCrystie Adams of Earthjustice, the Coalition's lead attorney. "The Pipeline would devastate the Green River, one of our last great rivers and a sanctuary for native fish and wildlife."
In its intervention comments, the Colorado River Protection Coalition asserted that the Flaming Gorge Pipeline is extremely unlikely to be permitted because it would likely violate the Endangered Species Act and adversely affect five national wildlife refuges; part of the project would be located in a U.S. Forest Service roadless area. The coalition also argued that the permit should be denied because the applicant (Wyco) failed to meet various requirements during a previous attempt at permitting a nearly identical project with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The pipeline is an extremely environmentally damaging water-supply project that would irrevocably harm the Green and Colorado rivers, not a “hydropower project” as claimed by the applicant; therefore FERC is not the appropriate agency to lead federal review of the proposal.
“The Flaming Gorge Pipeline would severely impact the Wyoming landscape it crosses,” said Steve Jones of the Wyoming Outdoor Council. “Our state’s heritage, wildlife and economy are dependent on protecting roadless and wilderness areas.”
“Four endangered fish — the Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, razorback sucker and bonytail chub — rely on the water this pipeline would drain from the Green and Colorado rivers,” said Taylor McKinnon of the Center for Biological Diversity in Flagstaff, Ariz. “The pipeline would spell disaster for those fish and the river ecosystems we and they both depend on. It’s a foolish proposal in the face of global warming and projected declines in river flows.”
“The Green River flows through Utah’s largest roadless area, provides 40 percent of the water entering the Colorado River at Lake Powell each year, and supports a world-famous trout fishery averaging 6,000 – 8,000 fish per mile,” said Zach Frankel, executive director of the Utah Rivers Council. “This catastrophic proposal would not only mar these treasures, it would forever alter life in Utah.”
Wyco previously sought a permit for the pipeline from a different federal agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In July 2011 the Corps terminated its review of the project because Wyco missed multiple deadlines and did not provide information requested by the Corps. A few months later, Wyco redesigned the project to include some incidental hydropower components and requested review through FERC. Despite the modifications, the project remains a huge energy hog — at least nine air-polluting, natural gas-fired pumping stations would be required to pump the water uphill across Wyoming and over the Continental Divide. Wyco’s president has acknowledged that pumping the water uphill would use more energy than the project would create through hydropower.
“We know this project would burn more energy than it produces,” said John Spahr of the Sierra Club. “Claiming it is a hydropower project is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to make an end run around federal law.”
Since its inception, the extremely controversial Flaming Gorge Pipeline has met with great opposition in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah. The water would go to the Front Range of Colorado, which is projected to double in population in the next 50 years. Colorado is already a parched state with severely depleted rivers, while the majority of the water in Colorado’s cities is used to keep lawns green for three months in the hot, dry summer across sprawling suburban landscapes.
Said Duane Short of Biodiversity Conservation Alliance: “The coalition believes that Colorado and other western citizens are beginning to realize that unbridled consumption of water from our rivers and aquifers will leave our precious water resources depleted leading to even more severe water shortages for our children and grandchildren. We hope the public will work with us to prevent this shortsighted and irresponsible water grab.”
“The Flaming Gorge Pipeline would be a flaming disaster for Colorado,” said Gary Wockner of Save the Poudre: Poudre Waterkeeper. “The Pipeline would be a devastating step backwards for water supply policy and river protection in Colorado and the Southwest U.S. — our coalition will work as long and hard as it takes to stop this project.”
The coalition’s intervention comments can be downloaded here.