Kavanaugh Ruled Against Wildlife 96 Percent of the Time
There are plenty of reasons to oppose Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh for the U.S. Supreme Court, including the danger he poses to the environment and civil rights. And his track record shows he'll be terrible for wildlife.
The Center for Biological Diversity's Bill Snape analyzed Kavanaugh's 12 years on the U.S. District Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., and found he ruled against wildlife and endangered species 96 percent of the time. Often, Snape discovered, Kavanaugh took strident positions against species protection. He typically favored corporate interests over established science. There's no reason to expect him to act any differently if he makes it onto the Supreme Court.
Read more in HuffPost, and urge your senator to vote no on Kavanaugh.