COURT
STRIKES DOWN MASSIVE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
DEVELOPMENT
On
10-24-03, a Kern County Superior
Court judge struck
down a decision by the Kern County
Board of Supervisors’ to
approve one of the largest
industrial developments
in Kern County history. The Tejon
Industrial Complex-East
would have developed 1,109 acres
with a 15 million
square foot Industrial Complex and
would have been
twice the size of downtown
Bakersfield.
The
Court determined that the
County’s environmental
analysis did not adequately review
impacts on air quality.
In 2002, Kern County was the second
most ozone-polluted
county in the country (behind only San
Bernardino County)
and received an F grade in the
American Lung Association’s
annual State of the Air Report. The
Court also found
fault with the County’s failure
to analyze the
air emissions generated by the broad
array of industrial
and manufacturing uses approved for
the Industrial
Complex. The County declined to
speculate about the
actual future tenants of the
Industrial Complex, but
at the same time tried to exempt those
future uses
from the required environmental review
altogether.
This
suit represents the first phase of
what will be a
long-term effort to protect Tejon
Ranch from the
sprawl development that characterizes
much of southern
California. The suit was brought by
the Center for
Biological Diversity, Sierra Club,
Center on Race,
Poverty, & the Environment, and
Kern Audubon. It
was argued by Kassie Siegel and Julie
Teel of the Center
for Biological Diversity.
Learn more about the Center's Urban
Sprawl Program.
ANOTHER
BUSH ROLLBACK OF DESERT PROTECTION
REVERSED
A federal judge has reinstated a ban
on off-road vehicles within 48,000
acre of endangered
species habitat
within southern California’s
Algodones Dunes.
The Clinton administration agreed to
close the area
to destructive off-roading to protect
the endangered
Peirson’s milk-vetch and an
additional 160 other
species living in the largest dune
system in the United
States. The Bush administration,
however, reversed
that decision, allowing vehicles back
onto the BLM
lands.
The Center for Biological Diversity,
Sierra Club,
Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility and
Desert Survivors filed suit, winning
an injunction
that will keep the dunes safe until a
new management
plan is prepared and legally reviewed
for its impacts
on the fragile desert
ecosystem.
The same judge on 9-18-03 reversed a
different Bush
administration decision to open more
than 400 miles
of off-road vehicle routes tracing
across 685,000 acres
of the Mojave Desert. That Bush
decision also rolled
back environmental protection
previously put in place.
The case was argued by Brendan
Cummings and Julie Teel
of the Center for Biological
Diversity.
Learn more about the Center's Deserts
Program.
SUIT
FILED AGAINST MASSIVE PALM SPRINGS
DEVELOPMENT
The Center for Biological Diversity
and the Sierra Club have filed suit
to overturn the
City of Palm Springs'
approval of a sprawling residential
and resort development.
The project, known as the "Palm
Springs Classic," would
blade 460 acres of wildlife habitat
between the Whitewater
River and the Palm Springs airport to
make way for
1,450 homes, an 18 hole golf course, a
500 room hotel,
timeshare units, as well as assorted
clubhouses and
an additional golf course in the
active channel of
the Whitewater River.
The project site is habitat for a host of
threatened,
endangered and sensitive species,
including the Coachella
Valley fringe-toed lizard, flat-tailed
horned lizard,
loggerhead shrike, Palm Springs ground
squirrel, Palm
Springs pocket mouse, and California
burrowing owl.
The Palm Springs Classic Project will
also generate
over 18,000 vehicle trips per day and
create severe
air quality impacts.
The case is being argued by Terry
Kilpatrick
and Wayne Brechtel (Worden,
Williams, Richmond, Brechtel & Kilpatrick)
and Kassie Siegel of the Center for
Biological Diversity.
Learn
more about the Center's Urban
Sprawl Program.
WILDERNESS
STREAM POISONING PROJECT
STOPPED
A controversial U.S. Forest Service plan
to poison
Silver King Creek within the
Carson-Iceberg Wilderness
Area in the Toiyabe National Forest
with rotenone has
been stopped. The project was designed
to kill off
non-native fish in order to return the
Paiute trout,
and endangered species to the stream.
The trout can
not survive in the presence of the
exotic fish. Though
the Center for Biological Diversity
supports native
trout restoration projects, including
the removal of
non-native fish, we filed suit because
the project
was exempted from environmental review
and did not
consider less drastic alternatives.
Nancy Erman, a
prominent Sierra Nevada aquatic
biologist, also joined
the suit.
The Forest Service’s inadequate
environmental
review failed to evaluate the
potential ecosystem damage
from the poisoning, potential
irreversible damage to
the food chain Paiute trout depend
upon, the impacts
of California Fish and Game’s
continued stocking
of non-native trout, and lack of
success from past
rotenone poisonings. The Center will
work to ensure
the Paiute trout restoration goes
forward with full
consideration of alternative methods
of removal of
non-native trout.
Attorney Julia Olson of Wild Earth
Advocates filed
the successful legal action against the
Forest Service.
Learn
more about the Center's River
& Watershed Protection
Program.
Learn more about the Center's Western
Native Trout Program.
SUIT
FILED TO PROTECT RARE NEW MEXICO
BUTTERFLY
The Center for Biological Diversity
filed suit against the Bush
administration for delaying
Endangered Species
Act protection for the Sacramento
Mountains checkerspot
butterfly. In response to a petition
and lawsuit from
the Center, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service proposed
to list the butterfly as an endangered
species in 2001,
but the Bush administration has
delayed issuance of
a final decision. The Bush
administration has the lowest
rate of adding imperiled species to
the endangered
species in the history of the ESA and
highest rate
of removing them. It is the only
administration to
declare (three times) that the
extinction of wildlife
populations is
"insignificant" and thus should
not be prohibited by the Endangered
Species Act.
While the butterfly has been waiting for
protection,
Fish and Wildlife has determined that
several projects
will harm the species, including
construction at three
campgrounds, a new powerline and
associated service
road and corridor, livestock grazing
on several allotments,
a land transfer between the Forest
Service and the
village of Cloudcroft, and a large
Forest Service timber
sale.
The Cloudcroft checkerspot butterfly
is checkered with
white and deep orange squares
separated by black
bands and is about two inches across
its wings. It
occurs in alpine meadows in a small
area surrounding
the Village of Cloudcroft, New
Mexico.
The Center is represented by Steve
Sugarman of Belin
and Sugarman.
Learn
more about the Sacramento
Mountains checkerspot
butterfly.
Click
now and become a member of the Center
for Biological
Diversity, and ensure a future for
wildlife and habitat.
Center
for Biological Diversity | PO
Box 710 Tucson, AZ 85702 | 520-623-5252 | [email protected]
This message was sent to [email]. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from Center for Biological Diversity - Biodiversity Activist, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).
|